“
“Depression has a huge societal impact, making accurate measurement paramount. While there are several available measures, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD) is a popular assessment tool that has wide applicability in the general population. In order to reflect modern diagnostic criteria and improve upon psychometric limitations of its predecessor, Selleck Bafilomycin A1 the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R) was recently created, but has yet to be publicized. This study explored psychometric properties of the CESD-R across
a large community sample (N=7389) and smaller student sample (N=245). A newly proposed algorithmic classification method yielded base-rates PCI 32765 of depression consistent with epidemiological results. Factor analysis suggested a unidimensional factor structure, but important utility for two separate symptom clusters. The CESD-R exhibited good psychometric properties, including high internal consistency, strong factor loadings, and theoretically consistent convergent and divergent validity with anxiety, schizotypy, and positive and negative affect. Results suggest the CESD-R is an accurate and valid measure of depression in the general population with advantages such as free distribution
and an atheoretical basis. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“To the Editor: Crane and coworkers (Aug. 8 issue)(1) report on the relationship between glucose levels and the risk of dementia in participants whose mean age at baseline was 76 years. Their analysis is limited by the fact that the established and readily available confounder of renal function had not been accounted for. In the United States, 62.2% of persons 80 years of age or older have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 60 ml per Parvulin minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area.(2) Moderate renal impairment has been shown to be associated with an excess risk of …”
“Purpose: We characterized variation in the clinical presentation
between older and younger first time symptomatic stone formers in the general population.
Materials and Methods: We studied a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with their first diagnostic code for urolithiasis between 1984 and 2003. Chart validated symptomatic stone formers had a confirmed stone by imaging or stone passage. Clinical presentation characteristics were compared between age groups.
Results: Among the 3,473 charts reviewed there were 1,590 validated incident symptomatic stone formers (mean age 43 years, range 18 to 96). Older individuals were more likely to present with atypical or no pain, fever, diarrhea, pyuria, urinary tract infections and bacteremia (p < 0.001). Stone size and location did not differ by patient age.