The #learn more randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# method differs from other complicated methods, such as the electronbeam, followed by etching. Figure 3 XRD spectra (a) and wavelength-dependent

reflectance (b). (a) XRD spectra of AZO film surface and antireflection coatings of the flat-top ZnO nanorods and the tapered ZnO nanorods. (b) Wavelength-dependent reflectance of non-selenized CIGS solar cell before (black line) and after (blue and green lines) deposition of antireflection coating of nanorods. The EQE of the CIGS solar devices was also measured to evaluate the effect of ZnO nanorod coating layer on performance improvement. Figure 4a compares the EQE data for the non-selenization CIGS devices with and without the ZnO nanorod antireflection coating layer. The CIGS cell with ZnO nanorods had excellent quantum efficiency at wavelengths ranging from 450 to 950 nm, owing to PF-6463922 the low optical reflectance of the ZnO nanorods. The quantum

efficiency of non-selenization CIGS cell with ZnO nanostructure drops off at a high energy of approximately around 320 nm -a lower energy than that without the antireflection coatings. This phenomenon is caused by the fact that the optical band gap energy of ZnO is lower than that of the high band gap material, of AZO layer [22], owing to the Burnstein-Moss bandgap effect. Figure 4b plots the photocurrent versus applied voltage (J-V) curve for the CIGS solar cells with and without the ZnO antireflection coatings under AM1.5 illumination. The CIGS solar cell with tapered ZnO nanorods reaches an efficiency as high as 10% to 11%. The cell conversion efficiency is 9.1% with an open-circuit voltage of 0.55 V, a short current density of 22.7 mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 72.3%. Based

on the J-V curves, the increase of the short-circuit current is believed to be related to the decrease in reflectance SB-3CT that is caused by the ZnO nanostructure antireflective coating layer. The gain in photocurrent due to the antireflective effect could be given by the previous work [23]. In this study, the comparative advantages that are provided by the ZnO nanostructures on non-selenized CIGS solar cells are indicated by the extra gain in the photocurrent G p (G p ≡ ΔJ sc/J sc), 11%, for the tapered ZnO nanorods. The tapered ZnO nanorod coating ultimately increased the efficiency of non-selenized CIGS solar cells by 9.8% from 9.1% to 10%. There are obvious improvements in photocurrent and efficiency enhancement. These are mainly caused by both the reduction of light reflectance and surface recombination centers by the window layer [24–27]. Figure 4 External quantum efficiency (a) and current-voltage characteristics (b) of solar cells. (a) Solar cell before (black line) and after (blue and green lines) deposition of antireflection coating of nanorods. (b) Bare non-selenized CIGS solar cell and flat-top/tapered ZnO nanorod antireflection-coated non-selenized CIGS solar cells.