However, this genus is currently undergoing a re-examination. For instance, a novel genus termed Cronobacter, has been recently coined, as a split-off of particular species/GM6001 strains belonging to the group. We found that the rpoB sequences of the two type strains of our novel proposed species groups, REICA_142T and REICA_082T, were quite distantly related to those of the type
species E. cloacae subsp. cloacae ATCC 13047T (89.3 and 90.5% sequence similarities, respectively) and Cronobacter sakazaki LMG 5740T (90.5 and 90.1%, respectively). These values are actually well below the reasonable limit of 6% sequence dissimilarity, which has been proposed to differentiate genera within the Enterobacteriaceae[18]. Epigenetics inhibitor In the future, these might be focal points for the definition of novel genera. It is interesting that both the 16S rRNA gene and the rpoB gene
sequence based phylogenetic analyses revealed the existence of robust clades (supported by MP bootstrap values of 100%, Figures 1 and 2), in which our novel group-I strains (REICA_142T, REICA_084 and REICA_191) were most related to the Enterobacter type strains E. radicincitans D5/23T and E. arachidis Ah-143T. It is important to remark that the latter strains have previously been shown to improve plant growth by increasing the root length, as well as the Selleck CBL0137 (dry) mass, of several host plants [19]. Therefore, an understanding of the ecology of our novel strains will add to a growing body of knowledge
on the species diversity of Enterobacter types in rice roots. Ecological behaviour is locked in into taxonomy in particular with respect to those traits that define phenotype. Immune system Given the fact that a sound species definition depends on a combination of techniques, including an analysis of genomic DNA relatedness, we determined the DNA:DNA homologies among a selection of our novel and closely-related strains. Genomic DNA:DNA hybridization analyses confirm the existence of two novel Enterobacter species Pairwise genomic DNA hybridization tests (Table 1) were performed across a selection of four strains of the two newly defined species (two each, including the two proposed type strains) and the closest relatives E. arachidis LMG 26131T, E radicincitans LMG 23767T, E. cowanii LMG 23569T and E. oryzae LMG 24251T (see above). First, these analyses revealed that the group-I strains REICA_142T and REICA_191 and the group-II ones REICA_082T and REICA_032 had high within-group DNA:DNA relatedness (93 and 89%, respectively), whereas the putative type strains REICA_142T (group-I) and REICA_082T (group-II) had low (38% ±10) DNA:DNA relatedness between them. These results suggested a taxonomic tightness within the two groups, versus a low relatedness between them.