The size of the soil seed bank of P annua is within the limits r

The size of the soil seed bank of P. annua is within the limits reported for the Arctic (3,400 seeds m−2 in undisturbed sites; McGraw and Vavrek 1989) and alpine (6,000 seeds m−2 in a disturbed site; Chambers 1993) tundra. The seed bank of sub-Antarctic regions has received less attention and seems to be smaller—about 1,000 seeds m−2 (Arroyo et al.1999).

Both C. quitensis and D. antarctica form in Antarctica a persistent soil seed bank of around 1,650 and 5,645 seeds m−2 respectively (McGraw and Day 1997, Ruhland and Day 2001). The abundance of P. annua soil seed bank is intermediate in relation to both native vascular plant species. Poa annua soil seed bank size underneath the tussocks, however large in comparison with other tundra plants, is just a fraction of the species’ seed bank as reported from temperate selleck products regions (30,000–210,000 seeds m−2; Lush 1988). In our preliminary research we found that around 45 % of seeds from the previous year’s infructescences are capable of germination (Wódkiewicz et al. 2013). This time we found that over 80 % of seeds extracted from the soil were viable, as revealed by germination experiments. Lower germination capacity of freshly collected seeds than of seeds LDC000067 nmr recovered from soil samples may also indicate that part of seeds are dormant upon collection and over time this dormancy is CBL0137 broken, thus enabling the seeds to form

a soil seed bank instead of germinating under sub-optimal conditions. This difference may also be associated with a seasonal variation in germination ability of P. annua in the Antarctic caused by huge differences between years in meteorological conditions (temperature, liquid water aviability, snow cover etc.) during the vegetation season (Kejna et al. 2013). Spatial structure of P. annua seed bank in the Antarctic

population Our sampling allowed the comparison of P. annua soil seed bank characteristics at Arctowski Station between points situated underneath the tussock and in the vicinity of the clump. Soil around clumps in either direction showed a minimal seed bank size in comparison with the center of the clump. The distance of 10 cm from the edge of a clump represented the space between clumps, as the clumps are spaced approximately at 30–40 cm distance (Fig. 2). The increased number of seeds in the soil beneath the clump might suggest that seeds are deposited Sulfite dehydrogenase mainly within the mother clump, and only a small fraction may be transported at a larger distance. The tussock may be an efficient seed trap in contrast with bare soil and act for seed accumulation similarly to larger shrubs (Bullock and Moy 2004). Artificial turf, similar to grass, has been shown to efficiently trap seeds blown by the wind in the Arctic tundra (e.g. Molau and Larsson 2000). Beside seed production, P. annua clumps may present safe sites for seed persistence (Jumpponen et al. 1999). Therefore we might speculate that the local spread of P.

Comments are closed.