For the perception of recovery scale, the dependent variable was

For the perception of recovery scale, the dependent variable was the normalized score calculated as the distance MEK inhibitor review from the left endpoint divided by the total length of the scale. Where significant main effects were observed, post hoc procedures were applied to see more examine within group changes over time. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to examine differences in adherence to training, where the number of training sessions completed served as the dependent variable, and the percentage of pills consumed to verify adherence to supplement consumption. The threshold for significance R788 cost for all tests was set at p < 0.05. Results Adherence to training There was no significant difference between groups in

adherence to training assessed by the number of training sessions completed (30.3 sessions for placebo, 29.8 sessions for SS, p = 0.50), or adherence to treatment assessed by the percentage of pills ingested (92.9% of pills in placebo, 86.3% of pills in SS, p = 0.10). 1-RM Figures 1 and 2 display the individual and mean responses for 1 RM bench press and 1 RM leg press. Bench press 1-RM increased by 18.2% (p = 0.008) with placebo and 11.0% with S (p = 0.001). Leg press 1-RM increased by 48.6% with placebo (p < 0.001) and by 50.5% with SS (p < 0.001). There were no differences in 1-RM improvement (bench press and leg press) between placebo and SS conditions (p-values > 0.28).

Similar results were observed when the values were normalized for body weight (data shown in Table 2). Figure 1 Individual and mean (±SD) responses in 1RM bench press in (A) placebo condition and (B) StemSport condition. Both groups improved significantly with training (p < 0.01), but there was no time × condition interaction (p = 0.28). Figure 2 Individual and mean (±SD) responses in 1RM leg press in (A) placebo condition and (B) second StemSport condition. Both groups improved significantly with training (p < 0.001), but there was no time × condition interaction (p = 0.652). Table 2 Mean (±SD) pre- and post-training values for strength, balance, and muscle function in the StemSport and Placebo supplementation conditions Parameter StemSport Placebo Pre Post Pre Post Weight Adjusted Bench Press 1RM* 0.84 ± 0.25 0.95 ± 0.21 0.83 ± 0.28 1.00 ± 0.22 Weight Adjusted Leg Press 1RM* 1.95 ± 0.71 2.97 ± 0.64 2.10 ± 0.85 3.19 ± 0.94 Height Adjusted Vertical Jump* 0.28 ± 0.06 0.31 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.04 Anterior SEBT 0.70 ± 0.11 0.70 ± 0.07 0.71 ± 0.07 0.68 ± 0.06 Posteromedial SEBT 0.91 ± 0.10 0.91 ± 0.60 0.92 ± 0.10 0.89 ± 0.09 Posterolateral SEBT 0.86 ± 0.11 0.86 ± 0.08 0.87 ± 0.11 0.85 ± 0.10 Eyes Open COM Excursion Velocity (cm/sec)† 4.49 ± 1.36 4.50 ± 1.16 4.71 ± 2.02 4.05 ± 1.15 Eyes Open COM Excursion Area 6.24 ± 2.76 5.79 ± 2.82 6.24 ± 2.49 5.40 ± 2.09 Eyes Closed COM Excursion Velocity (cm/sec) 9.91 ± 2.90 10.

Comments are closed.