5 cm2, respectively The median Dose 1 and 2 (boost) were 1500 cG

5 cm2, respectively. The median Dose 1 and 2 (boost) were 1500 cGy (range, 1250–1750 cGy) and 1750 cGy (range, 1750–1850 cGy), respectively. In all cases, the dose was prescribed to 0.5-cm depth from the applicator surface. The median treatment time was 36.5 min (range, 12–98 min). The median followup was 14.9 months (range, 1–41 months) and OS was 17.5 months (range, 6–34 months). The 2-year actuarial LC and OS for all patients were 80% and 20%, respectively (Figs. 6a and 6b). Eleven patients (68.7%) developed distant metastasis (DM) and had died owing to the progression of disease at the time of last followup. Among the 4 patients who

had an R1 resection, 3 died of DM disease (75%) and RO4929097 cell line 2 (50%) had evidence of local recurrence. None of the patients who underwent an R0 resection had a definitive local recurrence as of the time of last followup or death. IORT-specific AC220 price complications were identified by any description in the medical record of sign or symptom that could specifically be related to previous radiation treatment. Three patients (19%) developed toxicity Grade 3 described as “related to HDR-IORT.” All of them also had recurrent colorectal neoplasm. One patient developed ureteral stricture requiring nephrostomy and stent placement. The second patient

developed a pelvic abscess and ileal pouch/colonic fistula and a third patient developed a rectovaginal fistula. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicity was identified. Local failure after combined modality therapy remains a clinical challenge for many types of cancer, as further local options are often limited owing to postoperative and postradiation fibrosis and adhesions, the absence of intact fascial planes, and highly infiltrative disease. Systemic therapy may also be less effective in the setting of prior surgery and radiotherapy owing to poor vascular supply to the irradiated postoperative bed. Locally recurrent malignancies can cause severe pain owing to compression or nerve involvement, bleeding,

or obstruction of adjacent structures such as gastrointestinal or urinary tract. Retreatment using EBRT is limited by dose constraints for previously treated normal tissue adjacent to the tumor bed. Surgical resection of a recurrent tumor in a previously Bupivacaine irradiated field may be very challenging and outcomes have historically been poor, with 5-year survival rates of 0% for patients undergoing surgery alone for pelvic recurrence from rectal cancer (3). Thus, at most institutions, patients are treated with palliative intent; however, this subset of patients should be considered for salvage treatment using a multimodality approach. Radical resection with IORT has the advantage of delivering tumoricidal doses of radiation to areas with very high risk for local failure, while minimizing the dose to adjacent normal organs [7] and [8]. The DP technique adds additional flexibility in delivering HDR-IORT to complex, deep, and previously irradiated areas, especially in recurrent colorectal tumors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>